I honestly don't know what to write here. I guess, then I will continue and simply write for the sake of writing.

Does all art need to have a message?
No. Art does not need to have a message. I do art at times when I'm angry or happy or sad or horny. Do I know why? Not really? But it's still art. I guess the message inherent in the work is what people interpret or what they think it depicts. A girl with large breasts can be erotic for me, or simply a girl with big jugs. for someone else, it's a perverted piece of shit. What does this tell me? That this person's definition of perverted is "naked girl + big breasts." So messages are in art, whether you want it or not. Whether you intend it or whether you're just a pretentious cunt who says there's a subliminal message in your Disney-esque drawing.

For example: Abstract art. There is no such thing as abstract art. This is because the mind is constantly trying to make sense of what you see. If I look at a cup, then my mind tells me it's a fucking cup. If I look at a Pollock painting, then my mind is confused. It's abstract. It's abstract until I see some shape or form that resembles an animal or an object I'm familair with. Think of looking at the clouds and seeing shapes in them. Then they're not clouds so much anymore as much as they are bunny rabbits or some similarly demented telly-tubby shit. That's how I approach abstract art. As soon as I see an image within the image, it's not abstract anymore. I dunno what we could call that.